Ninety-one college subjects listened to Cognitive Interviews (CI) and Stand
ard police interviews of 7-year old children who were attempting to describ
e an earlier incident of playing a game of Simon Says. The subjects evaluat
ed the witness's credibility and also the interviewer's manipulativeness. T
he perceived credibility of the witness was not affected by the type of int
erview, i.e., the CI did not render the witness unduly credible. In additio
n, the CI interviewer was judged to be less manipulative than the Standard
police interviewer. These results were discussed in light of some potential
legal concerns about using the CI.