Continuous spinal anesthesia: A comparative study of standard microcatheter and spinocath

Citation
J. De Andres et al., Continuous spinal anesthesia: A comparative study of standard microcatheter and spinocath, REG ANES PA, 24(2), 1999, pp. 110-116
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10987339 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
110 - 116
Database
ISI
SICI code
1098-7339(199903/04)24:2<110:CSAACS>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Background and Objectives. This prospective, randomized study evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of a new subarachnoid catheter. Methods. Sixt y ASA I-IV patients aged 40-70 years, scheduled for total knee arthroplasty , were randomly distributed into group 1 (Spinocath; Braun Melsungen, Germa ny) and group 2 (Intralong; Pajunk, Germany). The study tabulated details o f subarachnoid catheter insertion, dural puncture, time to free cerebrospin al fluid (CSF) flow, anesthesia onset time, surgery anesthesia time, the up per level of sensory block reached, the anesthesiologist-evaluated degree o f difficulty with the technique, and the quality of analgesia obtained and complications. At the end of surgery, all the catheters were removed, and t heir patency was checked. Results. Spinocath insertion required 6.3 +/- 3.2 minutes in group 1 versus 3.9 +/- 1.2 minutes in group 2 (P < .01) with si milar difficulties with catheter introduction. Perception of dural puncture was better in group 1 (P < .05). There were significant intergroup differe nces in time to free flow of CSF through the catheter. In group 2, correct catheter positioning had to be confirmed by aspiration in 80% of cases (P < .05). At the end of surgery, the catheters were removed, and there were no significant differences between groups. The anesthetic blocks were similar with both systems. Patient opinion of the technique did not differ between groups, and regression analysis did not show any differences between group s or correlation to an) incident during performance of the technique. Globa lly, the anesthesiologists participating in the study considered both syste ms to be easy to use and adequate for continuous spinal anesthesia. With re spect to the advantage afforded by a directional needle in orientating the catheter within the spinal canal the Spinocath system-with a longer techniq ue performance time than the standard approach-involves a success rate and incidence of technical problems similar to that of the conventional techniq ue.