T. Uchiyama et al., Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients (7) evaluation of cytotoxicity test by CornePack (R), TOX VITRO, 13(1), 1999, pp. 163-173
The cytotoxicity test of neutral red (NR) uptake in normal rabbit corneal e
pithelial cells (CornePack") was validated as an alternative method to the
Draize rabbit eye irritation test (Draize test). We tested 38 cosmetic ingr
edients as well as isotonic sodium chloride solution in three phases of the
validation study. The test procedures were controlled among participating
laboratories under a common standard operating procedure (SOP). The concent
ration of test substances that showed a 50% reduction in NR uptake relative
compared with controls (median NR uptake concentration: NR50, mu g/ml) was
determined and compared with in vivo Draize scores. Six laboratories parti
cipated in the first phase of the validation study, seven in the second, an
d five in the third. The average interlaboratory coefficient of variation (
CV) was 32.9%. The correlation and rank correlation coefficients between th
e maximal average Draize total scores (MAS) and NR50 were -0.583 and 0.587,
respectively. When the anionic detergents were excluded from analysis, the
correlation coefficient increased to -0.738. When the cut-off point for po
sitive and negative irritation was set at MAS of 15 and the predictability
of this method was assessed by liner regression line, six substances (two a
cids, two alkanolamines and two alcohols) were false negative. Through this
project, it appeared that CornePack, supplied in kit form with frozen seco
ndary cultured cell in serum-free medium, could provide an effective, highl
y sensitive and simple preliminary screen for determining the cytotoxicity
of substances. These results suggested that CornePack might have the potent
ial to predict the MAS if definite criteria can be established for the comp
ounds to be applicable. However, it is important to understand the nature o
f CornePack responses since its NR50 profile was quite different from other
cytotoxicity assays. (C) 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All right
s reserved.