Can 3D volumetry of the fetal upper arm and thigh improve conventional 2D weight estimates?

Citation
Rl. Schild et al., Can 3D volumetry of the fetal upper arm and thigh improve conventional 2D weight estimates?, ULTRASC MED, 20(1), 1999, pp. 31-37
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN
ISSN journal
01724614 → ACNP
Volume
20
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
31 - 37
Database
ISI
SICI code
0172-4614(199902)20:1<31:C3VOTF>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
Aim: To determine the usefulness of three-dimensional ultrasound volumetry of fetal thigh and upper arm in predicting weight at delivery. Method: Incl usion criteria to our prospective study were singleton pregnancies with a p lanned or expected delivery within 96 hours of enrollment. In 74 patients ( formula-finding group) standard fetal biometry, followed by measurement of thigh and upper arm volumes by three-dimensional ultrasound, was performed. Subsequently, our new 3D-formulas were tested in a prospective validation group of 52 patients. Results: Both upper arm and thigh volumes correlated well with birth weight (r(2)=0.95, respectively, p<0.0001). The best result , however, was achieved by a combination of standard 2D-measurements with t he volumetric data of upper arm and thigh (r(2)=0.98, p < 0.0001). With use of polynomial regression analysis we obtained two best-fit formulas: Birth weight: - 263.8 + 13.7269 * Arm Volume + 7.16575 * Thigh Volume + 148.2 * ATD. Birth weight: 1288.7 + 51.9502 * Arm Volume - 0.252 * Arm Volume(2) -2 .1766 * Thigh Volume + 0.0321 * Thigh Volume(2) + 36.2509 * GA 0.7526 * GA( 2)+ 654.3 * BIP-36.6136 * BIP2- 381.8 * ATD + 24.0927 * ATD(2). Conclusion: Three-dimensional volumetry of the fetal thigh and upper arm may improve p rediction of birth weight. Further larger studies are needed to validate ou r results.