A. Paul et al., UNACCEPTABLE RESULTS OF THE MAYO PROCEDURE FOR REPAIR OF ABDOMINAL INCISIONAL HERNIAS, The European journal of surgery, 164(5), 1998, pp. 361-367
Objective: To evaluate the current practice of incisional hernia repai
r in Germany and analysis of the results of the Mayo duplication techn
ique done in our hospital over a 10-year period. Design: Nationwide su
rvey, retrospective analysis. Setting: University department, Germany.
Subjects: Survey of most surgical departments and of 114 patients wit
h 135 incisional hernias in our unit. Intervention: Mayo duplication r
epair incisional hernias. Main outcome measures: Common practice, recu
rrence rates, quality of Life. Results: The Mayo overlap is the prefer
red technique in most surgical departments. The estimated failure rate
s (12% or less) in general practice are grossly underestimated. In our
hospital the recurrence rate after Mayo duplication repair was 61/114
(54%) during a follow up time of 5.7 years with a follow-up-rate of 8
4%. Univariate and multivariate analyses failed to identify any predis
posing factors. All patients with incisional hernias had limitations t
heir physical function. Conclusions: The widely used Mayo procedure le
ads to unacceptable results for repair of incisional hernias and other
techniques should be evaluated and used more often. Repair of an inci
sional hernia does not improve overall quality of life.