RUMINALLY PROTECTED LYSINE OR LYSINE AND METHIONINE FOR LACTATING DAIRY-COWS FED A RATION DESIGNED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS FOR MICROBIAL AND POSTRUMINAL PROTEIN
Ph. Robinson et al., RUMINALLY PROTECTED LYSINE OR LYSINE AND METHIONINE FOR LACTATING DAIRY-COWS FED A RATION DESIGNED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS FOR MICROBIAL AND POSTRUMINAL PROTEIN, Journal of dairy science, 81(5), 1998, pp. 1364-1373
The purpose of this study was to separate the effects of ruminally pro
tected Lys from effects of ruminally protected Met on the performance
of lactating dairy cows fed a ration calculated to be first-limiting i
n intestinally delivered Lys and second-limiting in intestinally deliv
ered Met. Thirty multiparous Holstein cows were examined in a 20-wk st
udy that started on wk 5 postpartum Rations contained timothy silage,
corn silage, barley, corn, corn gluten meal, and soybean meal. Treatme
nts were 1) no supplemental amino acids, 2) 21 g/d of intestinally ava
ilable Lys, and 3) 22 g/d of intestinally available Lys and 6 g/d of i
ntestinally available Met. Post-experimental calculations suggested th
at, in contrast to the objective, the unsupplemented ration was colimi
ting in intestinally available His (0.96 of requirement), followed by
Lys (1.00), digestible ruminally undegraded protein (1.01), Ile (1.03)
, Arg (1.04), Val (1.10), and Met (1.14). In this context, the virtual
ly identical performance of cows fed the unsupplemented ration and cow
s fed the ration supplemented with ruminally protected Lys demonstrate
d that dairy cows did not respond to enhanced intestinal supplies of L
ys when Lys was not calculated to be the first-limiting nutrient. In c
ontrast, for cows fed rations supplemented with both ruminally protect
ed Lys and ruminally protected Met, the production of both milk protei
n (40 g/d) and fat (40 g/d) was numerically increased to an extent tha
t was consistent with earlier reported studies, although calculations
did not indicate that performance was limited by intestinal supplies o
f Lys or Met. This result, which may be disputed because of a lack of
statistical significance, suggests that Met, apparently unlike Lys, ma
y enhance the production of milk components beyond an enhancement expe
cted because of its role as a limiting amino acid.