D. Chen et al., HEMOGLOBIN-RALEIGH AS THE CAUSE OF A FALSELY INCREASED HEMOGLOBIN-A(1C) IN AN AUTOMATED ION-EXCHANGE HPLC METHOD, Clinical chemistry, 44(6), 1998, pp. 1296-1301
Irreversible glycation of the hemoglobin A(0) (HbA(0)) beta chain lead
s to the production of HbA(1C), which can be used to monitor long-term
blood glucose control in patients with diabetes mellitus. HbA(1C) is
less positively charged than nonglycated HbA(0), and this decrease in
charge is the basis of ion-exchange and electrophoretic methods that m
easure HbA(1C). We recently identified a sample that appeared to conta
in 46% HbA(1C) by an automated ion-exchange HPLC method (Bio-Rad Varia
nt(TM)) but only 3.8% by an immunoinhibition latex agglutination metho
d. A combination of traditional and mass spectrometric protein analysi
s and genomic DNA analysis of the Hb beta chain and genes revealed tha
t the patient was heterozygotic for Hb-Raleigh, a variant containing a
valine-->alanine substitution at position 1 of the beta chain. The am
ino-terminal alanine in this variant Hb is posttranslationally modifie
d by acetylation, leading to a charge difference similar to glycation
and making the behavior of HbA(1C) and Hb Raleigh virtually identical
in the ion-exchange HPLC method. This observation suggests that it is
important to confirm HbA(1C) values in excess of 15%, especially if th
ey are not consistent with the clinical picture, by an independent HbA
(1C) method such as immunoassay or boronic acid affinity chromatograph
y. However, for this particular variant Hb, even these latter methods
might be misleading, because the acetylated N-terminal amino acid of t
he Hb-Raleigh beta chain cannot be glycated.