COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING TOTAL ANTIOXIDANT CAPACITY OF HUMAN SERUM

Authors
Citation
Gh. Cao et Rl. Prior, COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING TOTAL ANTIOXIDANT CAPACITY OF HUMAN SERUM, Clinical chemistry, 44(6), 1998, pp. 1309-1315
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Laboratory Technology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00099147
Volume
44
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Part
1
Pages
1309 - 1315
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-9147(1998)44:6<1309:CODAMF>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Three assays were compared for the determination of total antioxidant capacity in human serum: the oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay, the Randox Trolox-equivalent antioxidant capacity (Randox-TEAC ) assay, and the ferric reducing ability (FRAP) assay. There was a wea k but significant linear correlation between serum ORAC and serum FRAP . There was no correlation either between serum ORAC and serum TEAC or between serum FRAP and serum TEAC. The effect of dilution on the seru m TEAC value and the use of inhibition percentage at a fixed time, wit hout considering the length of inhibition time in the quantitation of results, adversely affected the Randox-TEAC assay. The FRAP assay is s imple and inexpensive but does not measure the SH-group-containing ant ioxidants. The ORAC assay has high specificity and responds to numerou s antioxidants. By utilizing different extraction techniques in the OR AC assay, one can remove senun proteins and also make some gross diffe rentiation between aqueous and lipid-soluble antioxidants. However, th e ORAC assay requires similar to 60 min more than the FRAP or Randox-T EAC assay to quantitate results.