Y. Tokunaga et al., DENSITY OF HELICOBACTER-PYLORI INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH PEPTIC-ULCER PERFORATION, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 186(6), 1998, pp. 659-663
Background: A lack of change in prevalence of severe ulcer complicatio
ns requiring emergency operation has been reported, despite the common
use of histamine-2 (H-2)-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibit
ors. This may be attributable to use of ulcerogenic drugs or Helicobac
ter pylori (HP) infection, or both. In this study, HP infection was ev
aluated semiquantitatively in patients with peptic ulcer who required
surgery, and the severity of histologic change was investigated. Metho
ds: We reviewed a total of 113 consecutive patients (98 men and 15 wom
en) operated on for perforation, hemorrhage, or stenosis of gastroduod
enal ulcer between January 1986 and December 1995. Detection of HP was
carried out by immunohistochemical staining. We graded the density of
HP infection according to the number of individual HP bacteria counte
d in a highly magnified visual field (x 1,000 of light microscopy). Th
e grade of HP infection was defined as follows: (0) = 0; (1+) = 1-9; (
2+) = 10-29; (3+) = 30-99; (4+) greater than or equal to 100. The seve
rity of gastritis was evaluated by histologic examination using the cr
iteria of Rauws. Results: Although the number of operations for gastro
duodenal ulcer declined significantly, the rate of emergency operation
for gastroduodenal ulcer increased from 60% to 90%, with the result t
hat the frequency of operations for perforation or bleeding remained v
irtually constant and that for stenosis significantly decreased. HP in
fection was more prevalent in perforated ulcer (92%) than hemorrhagic
ulcer (55%) or stenotic ulcer (45%). The grades of HP infection were 3
.0 +/- 0.14 (mean +/- SEM) in perforated ulcer, 2.3 +/- 0.34 in hemorr
hagic ulcer, and 2.5 +/- 0.22 in stenotic ulcer. Perforated ulcer was
associated with significantly more severe HI) infection and gastritis
changes than hemorrhagic ulcer or stenotic ulcer. Conclusions: This st
udy indicates that patients with perforated ulcer were infected with H
P more severely than those with hemorrhagic ulcer or stenotic ulcer at
the time of surgery. A close relationship was observed between the pe
rforated ulcer and the density of HP infection determined semiquantita
tively using immunohistochemical stain. (C) 1998 by the American Colle
ge of Surgeons.