Jb. Kirkpatrick et Kl. Bridle, ENVIRONMENTAL RELATIONSHIPS OF FLORISTIC VARIATION IN THE ALPINE VEGETATION OF SOUTHEAST AUSTRALIA, Journal of vegetation science, 9(2), 1998, pp. 251-260
Australian alpine vegetation is confined to the southeast of the conti
nent and the island of Tasmania, it exhibits strong geographic pattern
s of floristic variation. These patterns have been attributed to varia
tion in edaphic conditions resulting from geographic variation in subs
trate, climate and glacial history. This edaphic hypothesis is tested
using floristic and environmental data from 166 quadrats distributed t
hroughout the floristic and geographic range of Australian alpine vege
tation. Environmental vector fitting in three-dimensional ordination s
pace, the number of significant environmental differences between all
pairs of 17 floristic groups and overall statistical analyses of the e
nvironmental differences between communities suggest a primacy of clim
atic variables over edaphic variables in explaining the broad patterns
of floristic variation. Continentality, summer warmth, summer rainfal
l and winter cold all provide a better statistical explanation of flor
istic variation than the most explanatory of the edaphic variables, ex
tractable P. The environmental variables that best discriminate the gr
oups at each dichotomy of the divisive classification of the floristic
data are largely climatic at the upper two levels, with edaphic, topo
graphic and biotic variables being generally more important than clima
tic variables at the lower levels. Many of the edaphic variables that
were most important in discriminating dichotomous groups were relative
ly insignificant in the broader analyses, suggesting that it is import
ant to partition large data sets for environment/floristic analyses. T
he results of such partitioning show that the environmental factors mo
st important in influencing floristic variation in alpine vegetation i
n Australia vary by location and geographic scale.