Dw. Langdon et al., DISCREPANTLY POOR VERBAL SKILLS IN POOR READERS - A FAILURE OF LEARNING OR ABILITY, British journal of psychology, 89, 1998, pp. 177-190
Poor verbal skills in poor readers have long been reported in the lite
rature. There have been many attempts to understand the interaction be
tween poor verbal ability and poor verbal achievement. The methodologi
cal problems are considerable, including the measurement of verbal abi
lity, which has been confounded by previous learning. A new reasoning
test, the VESPAR, has been designed to measure novel problem solving a
nd thus to be less reliant on acquired verbal skills. One hundred and
seventy 14-year-olds completed tie VESPAR, the Cognitive Abilities Tes
t (CAT) and a single-word reading test. Overall, verbal scores were we
aker than spatial scores. A subgroup of 38 pupils with particularly ma
rked discrepancies between verbal and non-verbal CAT was identified. T
he especially discrepant pupils were matched with other non-discrepant
pupils from the year group for either verbal or non-verbal CAT. The d
iscrepant group's reading was at the same level as the matched verbal
CAT group. However, the primary verbal ability of the discrepancy grou
p, as measured on the VESPAR, was greater than the matched verbal CAT
group. This raises the possibility that CAT-but not VESPAR-discrepant
pupils may be at particular risk of under-achievement in the verbal do
main.