BELIEVING DETAILS KNOWN TO HAVE BEEN SUGGESTED

In two experiments, participants viewed a videotape of a simulated arm ed robbery, later answered misleading questions about it, and then fin ally completed a source monitoring test. For the test, participants we re asked to indicate for each test item whether it was (1) seen in the video only, (2) read about in the questions only, (3) both seen and r ead about, (4) not remembered or (5) known to have occurred but the so urce was unclear. The latter response category was included on the tes t to remove source guessing and to ensure that attributions to 'video' , 'questions' or 'both' were caused by false conscious recollection. I n Expt 1, robust misinformation effects were obtained with both 1- and 48-hour delays between receiving misinformation and the memory test. However, suggested objects were more likely to receive 'video only' at tributions at long delay than at short. Experiment 2 verified that it was the interval between receiving the misinformation and the test, an d not the interval between viewing the video and receiving the misinfo rmation, that determined the effect of delay in Expt 1. The results ar e explained by assuming that, at short delay, participants remembered reading about the suggested objects and could discount the 'video only ' category. However, despite accurately remembering the source of sugg ested information, the misinformation effect as measured by 'both' res ponses was not diminished. Thus, remembering that misinformation was s uggested does not necessarily stop the creation of false memories.