Am. Ross et al., RESCUE ANGIOPLASTY AFTER FAILED THROMBOLYSIS - TECHNICAL AND CLINICALOUTCOMES IN A LARGE THROMBOLYSIS TRIAL, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 31(7), 1998, pp. 1511-1517
Objectives. We sought to assess the angiographic outcome, complication
rates and clinical features of percutaneous transluminal coronary ang
ioplasty (PTCA) after failed thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarct
ion. Background. ''Rescue angioplasty'' refers to mechanical reopening
of an occluded infarct-related artery (IRA) after failed intravenous
thrombolysis. Although the procedure is commonly performed, data descr
ibing its technical and clinical outcome are sparse. Early reports sug
gested that rescue PTCA is less often successful and produces more com
plications than primary PTCA, Other reports have described beneficial
effects of successful rescue PTCA but adverse outcomes when PTCA is un
successful. Methods. Using data from the Global Utilization of Strepto
kinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries
(GUSTO-1) angiographic substudy, we compared clinical and angiographi
c outcomes of 198 patients selected for a rescue PTCA attempt with tho
se of 266 patients with failed thrombolysis but managed conservatively
and, for reference, with those of 1,058 patients with successful thro
mbolysis. Results. Patients offered rescue PTCA had more impaired left
ventricular function than those in whom closed vessels were managed c
onservatively. Rescue successfully opened 88.4% of closed arteries, wi
th 68% attaining Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) grade 3
how. The interventions did not increase catheterization laboratory or
postprocedural complication rates. Multivariate analysis identified se
vere heart failure to be a determinant of a failed rescue attempt. Suc
cessful rescue PTCA resulted in superior left ventricular function and
30 day mortality outcomes, comparable to outcomes in patients with cl
osed IRAs managed conservatively, but less favorable than in patients
in whom thrombolytic therapy was initially successful. The mortality r
ate after a failed rescue attempt was 30.4%; however, five of the seve
n patients who died after failed rescue PTCA were in cardiogenic shock
before the procedure. Conclusions. Rescue PTCA tends to be selected f
or patients with clinical predictors of a poor outcome. It is effectiv
e in restoring patency. Patients who die after a failed rescue attempt
are often already in extremis before the angioplasty attempt. (C) 199
8 by the American College of Cardiology.