The history of the male infertility patient is of utmost value. A phys
ical examination is mandatory when psychosexual and ejaculatory dysfun
ction and male accessory gland infection are suspected, and even in th
e presence of azoospermia, It is also advisable to perform a physical
examination to exclude the presence of testicular tumours, The diagnos
tic assessment includes sperm analysis, history, physical examination,
the Valsalva manoeuvre, Doppler, ultrasonography, hormonal serum meas
urements, evaluation of testicular volume by orchidometry and evaluati
on of testicular consistency by palpation. The diagnosis of male infer
tility is descriptive and determination of true causality is almost no
n-existent. For decades, various therapies have been proposed to impro
ve sperm parameters in cases of male factor infertility. Administratio
n of anti-oestrogens and androgens is ineffective. No peer-review data
are available to demonstrate the benefit of the use of intrauterine i
nsemination or the correction of varicocele, Classic in-vitro fertiliz
ation is to some extent a solution for male factor infertility; howeve
r the two-pronuclear fertilization rate for patients with impaired sem
en samples is significantly lower than that for patients with non-male
indications. Conventional treatment for male factor infertility has l
ittle value and has been revised and abandoned. Intracytoplasmic sperm
injection is an effective treatment, even for cases of extreme oligoa
sthenoteratozoo-spermia. It has to be considered the method of choice
and should replace ineffective conventional therapies.