Tg. Reilly et al., LOW-DOSE FAMOTIDINE AND EFFERVESCENT CIMETIDINE IN HEALTHY-SUBJECTS -A PLACEBO-CONTROLLED OVERNIGHT PH STUDY, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 12(5), 1998, pp. 469-474
Background: Amongst the low-dose H-2-receptor antagonists available fo
r the self-medication of dyspepsia, both famotidine 10 mg and cimetidi
ne 200 mg have been shown to raise intragastric pH, but there is a del
ay after ingestion before significant effects can be demonstrated. A n
ew effervescent preparation of cimetidine 200 mg releases an acid buff
er which has a more rapid effect on intragastric pH. Aim: To investiga
te the relative abilities of low-dose famotidine and effervescent cime
tidine to raise intragastric pH after a single postprandial evening do
se, Methods: Twenty-four healthy subjects (12 men, 12 women, median ag
e 32 years) completed a three-period crossover trial of famotidine 10
mg, effervescent cimetidine 200 mg and placebo. After a standard meal
was given at 18.30 h to subjects fasted for 5.5 h, drug or placebo was
given at 19.30 h, Intragastric pH was recorded with combined glass el
ectrodes from 18.00 to 07.30 h by digital recorders. Results: Over the
12 h post-dose period the mean area under the pH/time curve (AUC) aft
er famotidine 10 mg was 3.73, after cimetidine 200 mg effervescent 2.7
9, and after placebo 2.07, Over the same period the median pH and perc
entage of time that recordings were above pH 3 were 3.45 and 52.5 afte
r famotidine 10 mg, 2.40 and 33.8 after cimetidine 200 mg effervescent
, and 1.68 and 15.9 after placebo, Both active treatments were signifi
cantly different from placebo by each measure (P < 0.001), and famotid
ine 10 mg was significantly more effective than cimetidine 200 mg effe
rvescent by each measure over the 0-12 h period (P < 0,001), Compariso
ns of mean AUCs for each 15 min period after dosing showed that decrea
se in acidity was significantly greater after cimetidine 200 mg efferv
escent than after famotidine 10 mg for the first 60 min, In the later
post-dose period only famotidine 10 mg raised pH for all time points t
o 12 h, whilst the effect of effervescent cimetidine 200 mg was detect
able to approximate to 8 h. Conclusions: Inhibition of gastric acidity
over the 12 h post-dose period was significantly greater and endured
longer after famotidine 10 mg than after effervescent cimetidine 200 m
g, but for the 60 min period immediately after dosing the effect on in
tragastric pH was significant following effervescent cimetidine 200 mg
but not famotidine 10 mg. This suggests effervescent formulations of
H-2-receptor antagonists with an acid buffer have a more rapid effect
on intragastric pH than film-coated tablets.