Lw. Gaber, ROLE OF RENAL-ALLOGRAFT BIOPSY IN MULTICENTER CLINICAL-TRIALS IN TRANSPLANTATION, American journal of kidney diseases, 31(6), 1998, pp. 19-25
There is current agreement that in the design of prospective clinical
trials, patients should be assigned to various treatment groups based
on histological diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection. The Banf
f schema is satisfactory in reporting and grading histology for patien
t entry into clinical trials, particularly in multicenter studies beca
use it standardizes the entry and randomization criteria and maintains
reproducibility of the histological interpretation between the differ
ent centers. It should be emphasized that for biopsy specimens to be e
ffective tools for either clinical practice or clinical trials, they n
eed to be obtained before therapeutic intervention and handled by expe
rienced histopathology laboratory technicians. Adequate tissue samplin
g is necessary for diagnosis and for proper grading of rejection. It i
s recommended that a minimum of two cores of renal tissue are needed t
o avoid underestimation of rejection grade. Banff classification consi
ders a biopsy specimen to be adequate if it contains seven or more glo
meruli and at least a single artery. Examination of serial step sectio
ns through the tissue samples is crucial to identify focal lesions of
toxicity and to properly score intimal arteritis and tubulitis, in add
ition, fast interpretation of the biopsy by an experienced nephropatho
logist or a transplant pathologist within 24 hours optimizes the utili
zation of the biopsy-acquired information, At the present time, it is
premature to decide on the role of graft histology as an endpoint in c
linical trials, but posttreatment biopsies should be encouraged in lar
ge, multicenter, prospective trials because they may be our only tools
to study postrejection changes. Semiquantitative biopsy reporting sys
tems should be routinely included in clinical databases to allow for t
he prospective examination of structure-function relationships and lon
g-term outcomes following acute rejection. (C) 1998 by the National Ki
dney Foundation, Inc.