D. Schneider et al., WELL-DIFFERENTIATED VERSUS LESS-DIFFERENTIATED ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA, European journal of gynaecological oncology, 19(3), 1998, pp. 242-245
The aim of this study was to compare well-differentiated (grade 1) and
less-differentiated (grades 2 and 3) endometrial carcinoma, concernin
g clinical risk factors, presenting symptoms and operative findings. S
eventy-one surgically staged endometrial carcinoma cases were reviewed
and retrospectively divided according to tumor differentiation into t
wo groups: grade 1 cases (Group I; n=40) and grade 2 and 3 cases (Grou
p II; n=31). No difference was found between the two groups when compa
ring patient age, gravidity and parity, history of hypertension, diabe
tes or other malignancies, duration of menopause, number of patients r
eceiving hormonal replacement therapy and histological type of tumor.
There was also no difference in presenting symptoms or in duration of
uterine bleeding up to the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. On the
other hand, patients with well-differentiated tumors, as compared to p
atients with less-differentiated endometrial carcinoma, were significa
ntly more obese (p<0.02), had a smaller uterus (p<0.01) and presented
with less advanced stage disease (p<0.0005). The fact that the age of
the patients, as well as the duration of uterine bleeding before diagn
osis, was similar in both groups may indicate that more advanced cases
, as in group II, represent originally a more aggressive tumor rather
than progression from a well-differentiated disease. This hypothesis n
eeds further research.