OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of diagnoses and procedure codes
in medical records for hip fracture patients. DESIGN: A validation sam
ple of hip fracture medical records was used to compare the facesheet
data with progress notes, operative reports, and discharge summaries f
or patients in a prospective study of functional recovery. SETTING: Ei
ght Baltimore hospitals with the highest volume of older hip fracture
patients. PATIENTS: Study subjects were 343 community-dwelling patient
s, 65 years of age and older, admitted to one of eight Baltimore hospi
tals between January 1990 and June 1991 with a diagnosis of hip fractu
re. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Facesheet diagnosis codes were compared wit
h admitting notes, discharge summary, and/or progress notes. The abstr
acted surgical procedure was compared with postoperative radiographs.
RESULTS: Excess coding of diagnoses on the hospital facesheet was evid
ent in 12% of charts. In 17% of charts, a complication identified in t
he chart was not coded on tine facesheet. More complications with low
severity were omitted. Agreement between the abstractor's procedure re
view and radiograph readings for arthroplasty was 84%. In 15% of patie
nts, the abstractor coded total arthroplasty when hemiarthroplasty was
done. CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancy between the hospital facesheet and the
medical record and between the abstracted surgical procedure and radi
ographs was found for hip fracture patients. This may make findings fr
om health outcomes research relying on administrative databases uncert
ain and reimbursement inaccurate.