The author calls attention to and discusses certain basic but neglecte
d and/or obscured features of Hegel's idealism. He treats these featur
es as paradigmatically sociological and uses them as a baseline with w
hich to chart Hegel's critique of, and against which to measure, Kant'
s Critique of Pure Reason. Section 1 introduces Hegel's criticism of K
ant's idealism; in contrast to his own objective idealism, transcenden
tal idealism is individualistic. This criticism is elaborated in secti
on 2, issuing in the quasi-Wittgensteinian indictment that Kant cannot
account for the possibility of language and human thought. Section 3
argues that Hegel's criticism that mind is social and that objectivity
cannot be understood in isolation from social interaction amounts to
a sociological critique of Kant.