DIGITAL IMAGE-ANALYSIS OF PROLIFERATIVE INDEX - 2 DISTINCT POPULATIONS OF HIGH-GRADE PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA IN CLOSE PROXIMITYTO ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE
Mh. Weinstein, DIGITAL IMAGE-ANALYSIS OF PROLIFERATIVE INDEX - 2 DISTINCT POPULATIONS OF HIGH-GRADE PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA IN CLOSE PROXIMITYTO ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE, Human pathology, 29(6), 1998, pp. 620-626
A considerable amount of data has been collected showing the associati
on of high-trade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) with aden
ocarcinoma of the prostate, and many studies have yielded results that
suggest that HGPIN is a precursor of carcinoma. A few studies have in
dicated that HGPIN may, in some cases, be a sequels of prostatic adeno
carcinoma. We examined the proliferative indices of HGPIN, carcinoma,
and benign prostatic epithelium by computer-aided counting of Ki-67-po
sitive nuclei in 15 cases in which HGPIN and carcinoma were in close p
roximity. There were 13 radical prostatectomy specimens with prostate
cancer and two cystoprostatectomy specimens with both transitional cel
l carcinoma and prostatic adenocarcinoma First, we showed the accuracy
of the computer-aided counting method compared with direct counting t
hrough the binoculars of the microscope. Then proliferative activity w
as assessed for each case by picking the two areas of carcinoma, the t
wo areas of HGPIN, and the one area of benign epithelium with the grea
test density of carcinomatous, dysplastic, and benign Ri-67-positive n
uclei, respectively. The total number of nuclei and the number of posi
tive nuclei were counted. Basal cells were not counted The mean prolif
erative index uas higher for cancer (caindex, average 0.054) than for
HGPIN (pinindex, average 0.048) (P<.05). We found that the 15 cases fe
ll into two distinct groups. The average ratio of pinindex to caindex
(pinindex/caindex) was lower in group 1 (0.72) than in group 2 (1.54)
(P=.17), and when the results were corrected for the nonzero y-interce
pts of the regression lines of pinindex versus caindex, the ranges wer
e widely separated, and the difference between the means was statistic
ally significant (0.15 v 0.62; P<.0001). A greater subjective similari
ty between the nuclear features in the HGPIN and those of the correspo
nding carcinoma was noted for the cases in group 2. The average value
of bngnindx was 0.014. The value of bngnindx did not correlate with ei
ther caindex or pinindex. We conclude that there may be two types of l
esions with the morphological appearance of HGPIN and that they may ha
ve different relationships to carcinoma Computer-aided counting of dig
itized microscopic images is both labor-saving and as accurate as enum
eration directly through the binoculars of the microscope. HUM PATHOL
29:620-626. Copyright (C) 1998 by WP. Saunders Company.