This article questions a widely shared assumption that posits the inco
mpatibility of religious politics and democracy. Using evidence from a
n analytically significant case, Belgium, it explores the political an
d institutional conditions under which religiously motivated aliberal
political actors Integrate successfully into democratic institutions.
The interaction of three factors is shown to be crucial: a political s
hift affecting the religious actor negatively, the existence of compet
itive institutions, and a centralized religious structure. The main th
eoretical implication is that democratic consolidation can be the cont
ingent outcome of self-interested political strategy rather than the r
esult of the pursuit of normative principles. The article underlines t
he institutional and political context in which religious movements ar
e embedded (as opposed to their political theologies) and the centrali
ty of agency and strategic calculation. it advocates placing the study
of religion and politics in a more broad theoretical perspective and
the study of democratization in a wider historical context.