DOES PREVIOUS SALPINGECTOMY IMPROVE IMPLANTATION AND PREGNANCY RATES IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE TUBAL FACTOR INFERTILITY WHO ARE UNDERGOING IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION - A PILOT PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
H. Dechaud et al., DOES PREVIOUS SALPINGECTOMY IMPROVE IMPLANTATION AND PREGNANCY RATES IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE TUBAL FACTOR INFERTILITY WHO ARE UNDERGOING IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION - A PILOT PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY, Fertility and sterility, 69(6), 1998, pp. 1020-1025
Objective: To evaluate the implantation rate and pregnancy rate (PR) i
n patients with severe tubal factor infertility who were undergoing IV
F. Patients who had undergone salpingectomy were compared with those w
ho had not. Design: A prospective randomized study. Setting: A departm
ent of obstetrics and gynecology at a university hospital. Patient(s):
Thirty patients who previously had undergone salpingectomy and 30 pat
ients who had not undergone salpingectomy before IVF treatment. Interv
ention(s): Laparoscopy with or without salpingectomy followed by IVF w
ith the use of combined GnRH agonist and hMG therapy in a long stimula
tion protocol. Main Outcome Measure(s): Embryo implantation rate and o
ngoing PR per transfer. The cumulative PRs were compared for the two g
roups of patients. Result(s): After the first IVF attempt, the implant
ation rate was 10.4% in the group with salpingectomy and 4.6% in the g
roup without salpingectomy. For all IVF attempts, the respective embry
o implantation rates in the two groups were 13.4% and 8.6%. The ongoin
g PR per transfer was 34.2% in the group with salpingectomy compared w
ith 18.7% in the group without salpingectomy. After four IVF attempts,
the probability of becoming pregnant was greater in the group of pati
ents with salpingectomy (75%) than in the group without salpingectomy
(63%). Conclusion(s): Previous salpingectomy in patients with severe t
ubal factor infertility who are undergoing NF seems to increase the em
bryo implantation rate and the PR per cycle of IVF. This monocentric s
tudy must be followed by other similar studies to allow for a metaanal
ysis and confirm this clear trend with definitive evidence. (C) 1998 b
y American Society for Reproductive Medicine.