Gx. Qiu et al., EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF GLUCOSAMINE SULFATE VERSUS IBUPROFEN IN PATIENTS WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS, Arzneimittel-Forschung, 48(5), 1998, pp. 469-474
A double-blind therapeutic investigation was performed on 178 Chinese
patients suffering from osteoarthritis of the knee randomized into two
groups, one treated for 4 weeks with glucosamine sulfate (GS, CAS 290
31-19-4, Viartril-S(R)) at the daily dose of 1,500 mg and the other wi
th ibuprofen (IBU, CAS 15687-27-1) at the daily dose of 1,200 mg. Knee
pain at rest, at movement and at pressure, knee swelling, improvement
and therapeutic utility as well as adverse events and drop-outs were
recorded after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. The variables were recorded
also after 2 weeks of treatment discontinuation in order to appreciat
e the remnant therapeutic effect. Both GS and IBU significantly reduce
d the symptoms of osteoarthritis with the trend of GS to be more effec
tive. After 2 weeks of drug discontinuation there was a remnant therap
eutic effect in both groups, with the trend to be more pronounced in t
he GS group. GS was significantly better tolerated than IBU, as shown
by the adverse drug reactions (6% in the patients of the GS group and
16% in the IBU group - p = 0.02) and by the drug-related drop-outs (0%
of the patients in the GS group and 10% in the IBU group - p = 0.0017
). The better tolerability of GS is explained by its mode of action, b
ecause GS specifically curbs the pathogenic mechanisms of osteoarthrit
is and does not inhibit the cyclo-oxygenases as the non-steroidal anti
-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) do, with the consequent anti-inflammatory
analgesic activities but also with the several adverse reactions due
to this not targeted effect. The present study confirms that GS is a s
elective drug for osteoarthritis, as effective on the symtoms of the d
isease as NSAIDs but significantly better tolerated. For these propert
ies GS seems particularly indicated in the long-term treatments needed
in osteoarthritis.