Hp. Platten et al., PHARMACOKINETICS AND THE PHARMACODYNAMIC ACTION OF MIDAZOLAM IN YOUNGAND ELDERLY PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOOTH EXTRACTION, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 63(5), 1998, pp. 552-560
Objective: To determine whether age-dependent pharmacokinetic and phar
macodynamic alterations account for a more pronounced response to benz
odiazepines among elderly patients. Methods: Twelve young patients and
10 elderly patients received an intravenous dose of 0.05 or 0.03 mg/k
g midazolam, respectively, before third molar extraction. Postoperativ
e pain was treated with 30 mg dihydrocodeine. Serum concentrations of
midazolam and sedative effects were monitored with visual analog scale
s and choice reaction time measurements for 6 hours. Test values above
baseline were integrated, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysi
s was performed. Heart rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturatio
n, and amnesia also were assessed. Results: There were no significant
age-dependent differences in disposition of midazolam between young an
d elderly patients (apparent volume of distribution, 1.3 +/- 0.2 versu
s 1.1 +/- 0.4 L/kg; half-life, 3.3 +/- 1.5 hours versus 3.7 +/- 2.2 ho
urs; total body clearance, 451 +/- 186 ml/min versus 343 +/- 137 ml/mi
n). However, higher values of area under the effect curve (AUEC) and A
UEC divided by area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) (se
nsitivity index) were observed among the elderly as follows: AUEC for
reaction time (AUEC(RT)) (573 versus 261; p = 0.042), AUEC for visual
analog scale (AUEC(VAS)) (37.7 versus 14.4; p = 0.011), AUEC(RT)/AUC (
6.3 versus 1.8; p = 0.007), and AUEC(VAS)/AUC (0.40 versus 0.11; p = 0
.009) compared with the young group. Likewise, mean concentration at h
alf-maximal effect for sedation was lower (p = 0.025) among older pati
ents (20.5 +/- 3.3 ng/ml) than among younger (29.7 +/- 6.6 ng/ml) pati
ents. Amnesia was observed among 86% of patients and oxygen saturation
was always 95% or more of basal value. There were no age-related diff
erences in concentration of dihydrocodeine and its active metabolite d
ihydromorphine, but dihydromorphine levels were much lower in three in
termediate metabolizers (445 to 879 fmol/L) and especially in five poo
r metabolizers (65 to 498 fmol/L) than among extensive metabolizers of
cytochrome P450 2D6 (1604 to 6490 fmol/L). Conclusions: Elderly patie
nts are more sensitive to the sedative action of midazolam than young
patients, and the sensitivity is caused by age-dependent pharmacodynam
ic alterations. The age-adjusted doses used are both effective (for se
dative amnesia) and safe (in terms of arterial oxygen saturation, hear
t rate, and blood pressure).