PHARMACOKINETICS AND THE PHARMACODYNAMIC ACTION OF MIDAZOLAM IN YOUNGAND ELDERLY PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOOTH EXTRACTION

Citation
Hp. Platten et al., PHARMACOKINETICS AND THE PHARMACODYNAMIC ACTION OF MIDAZOLAM IN YOUNGAND ELDERLY PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOOTH EXTRACTION, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 63(5), 1998, pp. 552-560
Citations number
49
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
ISSN journal
00099236
Volume
63
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
552 - 560
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-9236(1998)63:5<552:PATPAO>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether age-dependent pharmacokinetic and phar macodynamic alterations account for a more pronounced response to benz odiazepines among elderly patients. Methods: Twelve young patients and 10 elderly patients received an intravenous dose of 0.05 or 0.03 mg/k g midazolam, respectively, before third molar extraction. Postoperativ e pain was treated with 30 mg dihydrocodeine. Serum concentrations of midazolam and sedative effects were monitored with visual analog scale s and choice reaction time measurements for 6 hours. Test values above baseline were integrated, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysi s was performed. Heart rate, blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturatio n, and amnesia also were assessed. Results: There were no significant age-dependent differences in disposition of midazolam between young an d elderly patients (apparent volume of distribution, 1.3 +/- 0.2 versu s 1.1 +/- 0.4 L/kg; half-life, 3.3 +/- 1.5 hours versus 3.7 +/- 2.2 ho urs; total body clearance, 451 +/- 186 ml/min versus 343 +/- 137 ml/mi n). However, higher values of area under the effect curve (AUEC) and A UEC divided by area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) (se nsitivity index) were observed among the elderly as follows: AUEC for reaction time (AUEC(RT)) (573 versus 261; p = 0.042), AUEC for visual analog scale (AUEC(VAS)) (37.7 versus 14.4; p = 0.011), AUEC(RT)/AUC ( 6.3 versus 1.8; p = 0.007), and AUEC(VAS)/AUC (0.40 versus 0.11; p = 0 .009) compared with the young group. Likewise, mean concentration at h alf-maximal effect for sedation was lower (p = 0.025) among older pati ents (20.5 +/- 3.3 ng/ml) than among younger (29.7 +/- 6.6 ng/ml) pati ents. Amnesia was observed among 86% of patients and oxygen saturation was always 95% or more of basal value. There were no age-related diff erences in concentration of dihydrocodeine and its active metabolite d ihydromorphine, but dihydromorphine levels were much lower in three in termediate metabolizers (445 to 879 fmol/L) and especially in five poo r metabolizers (65 to 498 fmol/L) than among extensive metabolizers of cytochrome P450 2D6 (1604 to 6490 fmol/L). Conclusions: Elderly patie nts are more sensitive to the sedative action of midazolam than young patients, and the sensitivity is caused by age-dependent pharmacodynam ic alterations. The age-adjusted doses used are both effective (for se dative amnesia) and safe (in terms of arterial oxygen saturation, hear t rate, and blood pressure).