J. Ward et al., AUSTRALIAN GENERAL-PRACTITIONERS VIEWS AND USE OF TESTS TO DETECT EARLY PROSTATE-CANCER, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health, 22(3), 1998, pp. 374-380
To describe general practitioners' current beliefs, knowledge and self
-reported practices in prostate cancer screening, we conducted a natio
nal survey of 1,271 general practitioners, obtaining 855 completed que
stionnaires (67% response rate). Available tests for prostate cancer s
creening, namely DRE and PSA alone and in combination, were indicated
to be effective by 49%, 43% and 68% of respondents respectively, with
older GPs significantly more likely to hold these views. The effect of
guidelines was mixed. Less than 8% of respondents indicated they did
not recommend screening. Although the majority of GPs were unlikely to
adopt an opportunistic approach to prostate cancer screening, 63%, 57
% and 46% indicated they would recommend DRE, PSA or both respectively
during a dedicated health check up. Awareness of relevant guidelines
was low, with nearly half of respondents unable to recall publications
from the RACGP or ACS. Counter-intuitively awareness of ACS guideline
s for prostate cancer screening (which advise against screening) was s
ignificantly associated with the converse behaviour. Findings from thi
s first national study behove proactive and highly targeted disseminat
ion in general practice of the AHTAC policy announced by the Commonwea
lth Health Minister in August 1996.