M. Ozkahya et al., REGRESSION OF LEFT-VENTRICULAR HYPERTROPHY IN HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS BY ULTRAFILTRATION AND REDUCED SALT INTAKE WITHOUT ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation, 13(6), 1998, pp. 1489-1493
Background. Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is very frequent in hae
modialysis patients. Only few investigations have reported its regress
ion, and only by the use of antihypertensive drugs. Because volume loa
d is at least as important as pressure load, we investigated whether p
ersistent strict volume control by ultrafiltration alone may be effect
ive in improving LVH Methods. Using blood pressure (BP) and cardiac di
mensions as a guide, we treated all hypertensive patients in our dialy
sis unit during the 3 times weekly dialysis sessions for 4 h per sessi
on with as much ultrafiltration as they could stand. If they gained to
o much weight an extra isolated ultrafiltration (UF) session was appli
ed. Special attention was given to dietary salt restriction. The study
group of all 15 patients in whom echocardiographic assessment had bee
n made at least 1.5 years previously was selected retrospectively, and
we acknowledge that important confounding factors might not have been
controlled for. Cardiothoracic index (CTI) was estimated on the chest
X-ray. Diameters of left atrium (LA), left ventricle systolic (LVS) a
nd diastolic (LVD), interventricular septum (IVS), posterior wall (PW)
, and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were estimated by standard ec
hocardiographic methods. Results. Mean arterial pressure of the study
group had been lowered by UF before the first echocardiogram from pred
ialysis 136 +/- 11 to 101 +/- 14 and from postdialysis 119 +/- 8 to 92
+/- 12 mmHg. During a mean follow-up period of 37 +/- 11 months LVMI
decreased from 175 +/- 60 to 105 +/- 11 g/m(2). CTI decreased further
from 48 +/- 3 to 43 +/- 4%, while significant decreases of LA (22.5 +/
- 3 to 19.9 +/- 4 mm/m(2)), LVS (18.7 +/- 4 to 15.9 +/- 3 mm/m(2)) and
LVD (28.3 +/- 4 to 24.0 +/- 3 mm/m(2)) were seen in all patients. The
re also was a further decrease in both pre-and postdialysis BP to 116
+/- 12/73 +/- 7 and 105 +/- 7/65 +/- 3 mmHg respectively. Conclusion.
The results of this uncontrolled retrospective study suggest that good
long-term BP control and a decrease of LVM can be achieved by continu
ous efforts to control hypervolaemia. The decrease in volume may be ev
en more important than pressure reduction to achieve this goal.