A new method for vertebral height measurements, morphometric X-ray abs
orptiometry (MXA) based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, has been
proposed. This technique overcomes some limitations of morphometric ra
diography (MRX): the effective radiation dose is low, some sources of
geometric distortion are eliminated, such as dependence on patient pos
ition, magnification gradient, and the effect of scoliosis is minimize
d. The purpose of this study was to compare morphometric parameters ob
tained by both methods (MXA and MRX), and to evaluate the agreement be
tween morphometric evaluations and qualitative reading for vertebral f
racture diagnosis. The evaluation was performed with an Hologic QDR 20
00 device in 67 women without vertebral fractures and 31 women with ve
rtebral fractures (according to a qualitative assessment). The reprodu
cibility of the image analysis was <4% and comparable to MRX. The esti
mated bias between the two methods was on average 10 mm, and was a fun
ction of the vertebral height, according to the Bland and Altman metho
d. The agreement between MXA and other methods for vertebral fracture
diagnosis was poor for the thoracic level above T7, due to a lack of r
esolution and rib interposition. Agreement was also low for T10, due t
o the motion of the diaphragm muscle. MXA cannot currently be used for
the diagnosis of thoracic vertebral fracture in clinical practice. Te
chnological improvements are necessary to make this promising method u
seful as a screening tool to evaluate the presence of thoracic vertebr
al fractures.