RELATION BETWEEN SINGLE TOMOGRAPHIC INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND IMAGE PARAMETERS AND INTRACORONARY DOPPLER FLOW VELOCITY IN PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATELY SEVERE CORONARY STENOSES
Jw. Moses et al., RELATION BETWEEN SINGLE TOMOGRAPHIC INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND IMAGE PARAMETERS AND INTRACORONARY DOPPLER FLOW VELOCITY IN PATIENTS WITH INTERMEDIATELY SEVERE CORONARY STENOSES, The American heart journal, 135(6), 1998, pp. 988-994
Background Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging parameters have bee
n suggested as criteria to determine coronary lesion significance befo
re intervention. However, there hers not been a systematic examination
of combined anatomic and physiologic data in the same patients with c
oronary artery disease. Methods and Results To examine the relation be
tween coronary flow reserve and IVUS parameters, 41 patients with inte
rmediately severe coronary artery stenoses had measurements of coronar
y flow velocity (0.014-inch Doppler flow wire), coronary flow velocity
reserve (CVR) (hyperemic/basal mean flow), IVUS imaging (2.9F, Cardio
vascular Imaging Systems, Inc.), and quantitative coronary angiography
before intervention. Correlations between physiologic and anatomic pa
rameters were performed by simple regression. Results were also examin
ed by patient subgroups with CVR >1.8 or <1.8 to assess differences in
IVUS parameters. The angiographic percent diameter stenosis was 52% /- 17% (range 18% to 95%). Mean CVR was 1.88 +/- 0.56 (range 0.9 to 3.
18). IVUS minimal luminal diameter(r = 0.312, p = 0.047) and angiograp
hic percent stenosis (r = 3.05, p = 0.052) were weakly related to post
stenotic CVR. Comparing patients with CVR <1.8, IVUS reference segment
area, IVUS lumen area, and angiographic percent diameter stenosis was
higher (17.7 +/- 0.3 vs 12.9 +/- 4.4 mm(2), p < 0.05; 6.20 +/- 3.76 v
s 4.34 +/- 2.00 mm(2), p < 0.05; and 60% +/- 14% vs 46% +/- 17%, p < 0
.01, respectively) than in the group with CVR >1.8. Conclusions Despit
e a precise determination of cross-sectional vessel areas and absolute
dimensions by IVUS, single tomographic measurements did not correlate
well with coronary physiologic responses. These data suggest that the
physiologic data may be complementary to anatomic quantitative IVUS,
enhancing information for coronary interventional decision making.