Environmental security, as currently conceived., is rooted in the assu
mption that it is increasing populations, combined with static or decl
ining resource bases, that are the real cause of most current and futu
re conflicts. This is simply the restatement, on the global level, of
a local theory-The Theory of Himalayan Environmental Degradation-which
we already know is invalid. This does not mean that the environment i
s irrelevant to security, and that human ingenuity will always create
resources sufficient for us to resolve any crisis: that is an equally
invalid line of reasoning. The rejection of both these mutually contra
dictory orthodoxies, and their replacement by the more discerning, ref
lexive, and socially-informed understanding that has been pioneered by
those responsible for the demolition of the Theory of Himalayan Envir
onmental Degradation, is the key to a properly founded and useful noti
on of environmental security.