A. Michaleksauberer et al., SEVOFLURANE ANESTHESIA IN PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS - BETTER THAN HALOTHANE, European journal of anaesthesiology, 15(3), 1998, pp. 280-286
Forty-two children (aged 2-16 years) were randomly assigned to receive
either sevoflurane (n=21) or halothane (n=21) in nitrous oxide/oxygen
. After premedication with midazolam, anaesthesia was induced by facem
ask and the anaesthetic concentration was increased until loss of eyel
ash reflex (sevoflurane, 6%; halothane, 2.5%). Thereafter, 1-1.5 MAC o
f the inhalational agents were maintained until skin closure. Intra-op
erative analgesia was provided either by intermittent intravenous (i.v
.) bolus doses of fentanyl (2-3 mu g kg(-1)) or by a regional blockade
. Induction was smooth and the time to loss of eyelash reflex was slig
htly shorter with sevoflurane than with halothane, the difference not
quite reaching statistical significance (P=0.06). In both groups, hear
t rate remained stable and blood pressure decreased significantly duri
ng induction. Haemodynamic parameters remained stable during anaesthet
ic maintenance; no cardiac dysrhythmias were observed. Emergence time
with sevoflurane was 12.9 min vs. 16.3 min with halothane, but this di
fference was not statistically significant. It is concluded that sevof
lurane is as suitable for paediatric patients as halothane. The slight
ly faster emergence time offered by sevoflurane over halothane was of
no clinical significance in the present study.