Ct. Lamond et al., ADDITION OF DROPERIDOL TO MORPHINE ADMINISTERED BY THE PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA METHOD - WHAT IS THE OPTIMAL DOSE, European journal of anaesthesiology, 15(3), 1998, pp. 304-309
Eighty patients were recruited into a double-blind, randomized trial t
o find the optimal dose of droperidol for addition to the patient-cont
rolled analgesia (PCA) morphine infusate for female patients undergoin
g gynaecological surgery. A standardized anaesthetic technique was emp
loyed. Post-operative analgesia was provided by PCA morphine. Patients
were allocated at random into one of four treatment groups receiving
with each PCA morphine bolus: (1) droperidol 0.05 mg; (2) droperidol 0
.10 mg; (3) droperidol 0.15 mg; and (4) droperidol 0.20 mg, respective
ly. The incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV), reques
ts for rescue anti-emetic medication, and incidence of side effects we
re recorded. The number of symptom-free patients in each group increas
ed as the droperidol dose increased, but although there was a signific
ant inverse association between the total dose of droperidol received
and the severity of PONV (P<0.05), there were no significant differenc
es between individual groups. In each group, patients were significant
ly less sedated at 24 h compared with 12 h (P<0.01). However, after 24
h, patients in group 4 were significantly more sedated than patients
in groups 1 and 2 (P<0.05). There were no significant differences betw
een the groups in terms of the incidence of anxiety or other side effe
cts attributable to droperidol. The present authors suggest that, alth
ough the results demonstrate few statistically significant differences
between the four groups, a PCA bolus dose of droperidol of 0.10 mg mL
(-1) appears to provide the optimal balance between anti-emetic effica
cy and an acceptable incidence of side effects.