B. Skogseid et al., LIMITED TUMOR INVOLVEMENT FOUND AT MULTIPLE ENDOCRINE NEOPLASIA TYPE-I PANCREATIC EXPLORATION - CAN IT BE PREDICTED BY PREOPERATIVE TUMOR-LOCALIZATION, World journal of surgery, 22(7), 1998, pp. 673-678
Radiologically demonstrable pancreatic endocrine tumors are a frequent
requirement for exploration in patients with multiple endocrine neopl
asia type I (MEN-I). Such delayed intervention is accompanied by a 30%
to 50% incidence of pancreatic endocrine metastases. This study explo
res biochemical tumor markers and operative findings in relation to pr
eoperative pancreatic radiology in 25 MEN-I patients. They underwent p
ancreatic surgery with (n = 19) or without (n = 6) radiology, signs of
primary tumor and absence of metastases upon conventional examination
, including OctreoScan testing (n = 10), Biochemical diagnosis require
d an increasing elevation of at least two independent pancreatic tumor
markers. Tumor diameters averaged 1.1 cm (0-5 cm) and 0.9 cm (0.2-1.5
cm) in the patients with and without positive preoperative radiology,
respectively, These investigations never displayed more than one of t
he consistently multiple tumors, and the results were falsely positive
in 26%. Preoperatively unidentified regional or hepatic metastases we
re found at surgical exploration in 26% of patients with radiologic lo
calization and in none of the others, Limited pancreatic tumor involve
ment necessitated intraoperative absence of metastases and pancreatic
lesions less than or equal to 1 cm in diameter on palpation, intraoper
ative ultrasonography, and microscopy. It occurred in 37% and 50% of t
he patients with and without radiologic tumor localization, respective
ly, The number of positive tumor markers was similar for patients with
limited and major disease (2.3 vs. 2.7), whereas four or more such ma
rkers were found in all those with malignancies. The mean marker level
was higher ill patients with radiologically demonstrable tumors and l
ower in those wi;th limited disease, but with a substantial overlap. O
ctreoScan testing was negative in all cases with limited disease and w
as the single most sensitive method (75%) in the others, Limited pancr
eatic disease could not be identified preoperatively, and the present
means of biochemical pancreatic tumor identification invariably involv
ed the presence of at least one lesion greater than or equal to 7 mm i
n diameter, Conventional pancreatic imaging is insensitive and nonspec
ific for recognizing even substantial pancreatic tumors :associated wi
th MEN-I.