F. Monardi et Sa. Glantz, ARE TOBACCO INDUSTRY CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS INFLUENCING STATE LEGISLATIVE BEHAVIOR, American journal of public health, 88(6), 1998, pp. 918-923
Objectives. This study tested the hypothesis that tobacco industry cam
paign contributions influence state legislators' behavior. Methods. Mu
ltivariate simultaneous equations regression was used to analyze data
on tobacco industry campaign contributions to state legislators and le
gislators' tobacco control policy scores in 6 states: Campaign contrib
utions were obtained from disclosure statements available in the speci
fic state agency that gathers such information in each state. Tobacco
policy scores were derived from a survey of key informants wet-king on
tobacco issues in each state. Results. As tobacco industry contributi
ons increase, a legislator's tobacco policy score tends to decrease (i
.e., become more pro-tobacco industry). A more pro-tobacco position wa
s associated with larger contributions from the industry. These result
s were significant even after controls for partisanship, majority part
y status, and leadership effects. In California, campaign contribution
s were Still significantly related to tobacco policy scores after cont
rols for constituent attitudes and legislators' personal characteristi
cs, Conclusions. Tobacco industry campaign contributions influence sta
te legislators in terms of tobacco control policy-making.