Dj. Godden et al., DOMICILIARY NEBULIZER THERAPY - A VALUABLE OPTION IN CHRONIC ASTHMA AND CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE, Scottish Medical Journal, 43(2), 1998, pp. 48-51
Domiciliary nebulisers are in widespread use for patients who have sev
ere chronic airways disease, both asthma and chronic obstructive pulmo
nary disease (COPD). We report a study of the use of domiciliary nebul
isers designed to assess practical problems and the value of such ther
apy in preventing hospital admissions. A total of 405 patients underwe
nt a structured interview at home and their case records were reviewed
. Technical performance of the nebuliser compressors was assessed. The
mean (SD) age of those interviewed was 64.5 (12) years 185 patients h
ad a physician diagnosis as asthma, and 208 had COPD.87% patients used
their nebuliser at least once daily. Side effects, reported by 54% we
re related to frequency of use and commoner in younger patients. 29 su
bjects (7%) died within 2 years of receiving their nebuliser. Among th
e survivors, the 2 year periods before and after supply of the nebulis
er were compared. The percentage of patients requiring hospital admiss
ion for exacerbations of lung disease feel from 56% to 46% (p < 0.01)
but the number and duration of admissions was unchanged. Those whose a
dmission duration increased had more severely impaired spirometry when
the nebuliser was supplied and had lower activity scores and higher b
reathlessness scores at the time of interview indicating more severe d
isease. Approximately half of the compressors were malfunctioning and
patients' understanding of the principles of nebuliser treatment was p
oor. The provision of domiciliary nebuliser can influence hospital adm
ission in patients with obstructive airways disease. There is also a n
eed for improved patient education and for technical support which may
require the development of a nurse-run nebuliser service.