AUGMENTED THERAPY OF EXTENSIVE HODGKINS-DISEASE - RADIATION TO KNOWN DISEASE OR PROLONGATION OF INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY DID NOT IMPROVE SURVIVAL - RESULTS OF A CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP-B STUDY
M. Coleman et al., AUGMENTED THERAPY OF EXTENSIVE HODGKINS-DISEASE - RADIATION TO KNOWN DISEASE OR PROLONGATION OF INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY DID NOT IMPROVE SURVIVAL - RESULTS OF A CANCER AND LEUKEMIA GROUP-B STUDY, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 41(3), 1998, pp. 639-645
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: This prospective randomized trial in extensive untreated Hodg
kin's disease was undertaken to assess the potential benefit of augmen
ted therapy (12 months chemotherapy or radiation to known disease) com
pared to standard 6 months chemotherapy. Patient and Methods: A total
of 258 patients, mostly Stage IV, were randomized to four treatment re
gimens consisting of six cycles of CCNU, vinblastine, procarbazine, an
d prednisone (CVPP); 12 cycles of CVPP; six cycles of CVPP followed by
25 Gy radiotherapy; or three cycles CVPP, 25 Gy radiotherapy, and thr
ee cycles CVPP. Results: Complete remissions were achieved in 65% of a
ll patients. A 58% overall 5-year survival rate was obtained. Relapses
in irradiated areas of known disease occurred in only 6% of respondin
g patients. There was, however, no statistical difference in response
frequency, disease-free survival, or overall survival among the four r
egimens. Elderly patients responded less frequently. Conclusion: While
radiotherapy provided control of local (known) disease, no impact on
overall survival was apparent. Likewise, doubling the duration of chem
otherapy did not improve response or survival. Augmentation of therapy
with either radiotherapy or more chemotherapy in this study was of no
benefit compared to the standard 6 months of treatment. (C) 1998 Else
vier Science Inc.