BONE LOSS AROUND 2 DIFFERENT TYPES OF HIP PROSTHESES

Citation
Aj. Spittlehouse et al., BONE LOSS AROUND 2 DIFFERENT TYPES OF HIP PROSTHESES, The Journal of arthroplasty, 13(4), 1998, pp. 422-427
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Orthopedics
Journal title
ISSN journal
08835403
Volume
13
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
422 - 427
Database
ISI
SICI code
0883-5403(1998)13:4<422:BLA2DT>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) allows the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) around an uncemented hip prosthesis. The aims of this study were: 1) to determine the reproducibility of periprostheti c BMD measurements; 2) to delineate the time course of bone loss that occurs after insertion of a hip prosthesis; and 3) to compare the bone loss around two different types of hip prosthesis. We studied 20 pati ents: 11 had Bateman and 9 had porous-coated anatomic prostheses inser ted. The mean bone loss in 20 patients between 6 and 52 weeks alter su rgery was 6%. The greatest loss during this period was 18% and occurre d from the proximal medial cortex. We conclude that measurement of per iprosthetic bone mass by DXA is a precise technique. Bone loss was rap id in the first 6 months following total hip replacement. There was no difference in the bone loss occurring around the two prostheses studi ed.