POROUS-COATED VERSUS GRIT-BLASTED SURFACE TEXTURE OF HYDROXYAPATITE-COATED IMPLANTS DURING CONTROLLED MICROMOTION - MECHANICAL AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC RESULTS
S. Overgaard et al., POROUS-COATED VERSUS GRIT-BLASTED SURFACE TEXTURE OF HYDROXYAPATITE-COATED IMPLANTS DURING CONTROLLED MICROMOTION - MECHANICAL AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC RESULTS, The Journal of arthroplasty, 13(4), 1998, pp. 449-458
Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants with porous-coated and grit-blaste
d surface textures were inserted bilaterally in a paired design into t
he medial femoral condyles of eight dogs for 16 weeks. The implants we
re weight-loaded and initially subjected to controlled micromotion of
500 mu m during each gait cycle. Histology revealed that five implants
in each group had bony anchorage, and the remaining implants were sur
rounded by fibrous tissue. Push-out testing showed no difference in sh
ear stiffness and strength, while energy absorption for porous-coated
implants was increased significantly by threefold. The HA coating dela
minated on grit-blasted implants during push-out testing, whereas poro
us-coated implants predominantly failed at the HA-tissue interface. Co
verage, surface area, volume, and thickness of the HA coating were sig
nificantly reduced in vivo for porous-coated and grit-blasted implants
. In conclusion, a plasma-sprayed porous-coated implant surface seems
to give better fixation not only of the HA-coating to the implant surf
ace but also of the implant to the surrounding tissues in comparison t
o a grit-blasted implant surface. The HA coating was reduced more on f
ibrous-anchored than on bony-anchored implants, suggesting that microm
otion accelerates resorption of HA. Resorbed HA coating was replaced b
y more bone on porous-coated implants than on grit-blasted implants, w
hich suggests that fixation of porous-coated implants will be durable.