To review our experience with cases of narrow complex tachycardia with
VA block, highlighting the difficulties in the differential diagnosis
, and the therapeutic implications. Prior reports of patients with nar
row complex tachycardia with VA block consist of isolated case reports
. The differential diagnosis of this disorder includes: automatic junc
tional tachycardia, AV nodal reentry with final upper common pathway b
lock, concealed nodofascicular (ventricular) pathway, and intra-Hissia
n reentry. Between June 1994 and January 1996, six patients with narro
w complex tachycardia with episodes of ventriculoatrial block were ref
erred for evaluation. All six patients underwent attempted radiofreque
ncy ablation of the putative arrhythmic site. Three of six patients ha
d evidence suggestive of a nodofascicular tract. Intermittent antegrad
e conduction over a left-sided nodofascicular tract was present in two
patients and the diagnosis of a concealed nodofascicular was made in
the third patient after ruling out other tachycardia mechanisms. Two p
atients had automatic junctional tachycardia, and one patient had atro
ventricular nodal reentry with proximal common pathway block. Attempte
d ablation in the posterior and mid-septum was unsuccessful in patient
s with nodofascicular tachycardia. In contrast, those with atrioventri
cular nodal reentry and automatic junctional tachycardia readily respo
nded to ablation. The presence of a nodofascicular tachycardia should
be suspected if: (1) intermittent antegrade preexcitation is recorded,
(2) the tachycardia can be initiated with a single atrial premature p
roducing two ventricular complexes, and (3) a single ventricular extra
stimulus initiates SVT without a retrograde His deflection. The presen
ce of a nodofascicular pathway is common in patients with narrow compl
ex tachycardia and VA block. Unlike AV nodal reentry and automatic jun
ctional tachycardia, the response to ablation is poor.