E. Soderling et al., GROWTH OF XYLITOL-RESISTANT VERSUS XYLITOL-SENSITIVE STREPTOCOCCUS-MUTANS STRAINS IN SALIVA, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 56(2), 1998, pp. 116-121
Five Streptococcus mutans pairs (serotype c S. mutans 10449 and four c
linical isolates of S. mutans: 123.1, LG1, OMFA, T10B) were used to fi
nd out if the xylitol-resistant (X-R) natural mutants of the correspon
ding xylitol-sensitive (X-S) S. mutans parental strains differ in thei
r growth patterns in saliva. The isogenic X-R natural mutants of the p
arental S. mutans strains were selected after sequential cultivations
in the presence of xylitol and glucose. The X-R/X-S strains pairs were
growth in individual and pooled glucose-supplemented filter-sterilize
d salivas (one to five sequential cultivations). The two salivas used
represented subjects with good or poor support of the growth of S. mut
ans in vivo. Protease and peptidase activities were determined from th
e saliva growth media and cell suspensions. Salivary protein profiles
were analyzed using SDS-PAGE and native IEF before and after the culti
vations. The growth properties of the X-R/X-S S. mutans pairs were sim
ilar in both individual and pooled salivas. Sequential cultivation of
all strains did not show any differences in growth patterns. X-S strai
ns were inhibited by the presence of xylitol (2% w/v) in pooled saliva
, as shown for other glucose-supplemented media. Protease and peptidas
e activities of the X-R/X-S S. mutans pairs were low and of similar ma
gnitude. Also, the general hydrolytic properties of most X-R/X-S S. mu
tans pairs appeared similar as judged by the small growth-induced chan
ges in salivary protein profiles. In conclusion, saliva, the source of
nutrients for salivary microorganisms in vivo, favored neither the X-
R nor the X-S strains of S. mutans.