EVALUATION OF INFECTION-CONTROL PARAMETERS ACCORDING TO THE 1994 CENTERS-FOR-DISEASE-CONTROL AND PREVENTION TUBERCULOSIS GUIDELINES - A 2-YEAR EXPERIENCE
Ps. Grant, EVALUATION OF INFECTION-CONTROL PARAMETERS ACCORDING TO THE 1994 CENTERS-FOR-DISEASE-CONTROL AND PREVENTION TUBERCULOSIS GUIDELINES - A 2-YEAR EXPERIENCE, American journal of infection control, 26(3), 1998, pp. 224-231
Background: Because of classification as a high-risk institution for p
otential Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposure and an employee purified
protein derivative conversion rate of 2.7%, a large university-affilia
ted county hospital enhanced administrative and engineering controls,
as recommended by its tuberculosis task force in early 1994. Methods:
For 1994 and 1995 the medical records of all patients with culture-con
firmed M. tuberculosis were reviewed according to the 1994 Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for case surveillance and r
isk assessment (infection control parameters). The chi(2)-test was use
d to compare 1994 and 1995 infection control parameters for statistica
l significance (p less than or equal to 0.05). Results: In 1994 and 19
95 there were 253 patients with tuberculosis, 85% of whom (214/253) ha
d pulmonary-site tuberculosis. The ''representative'' patient with pul
monary tuberculosis was profiled, along with institution-specific surv
eillance data on diagnostics, medication regimens, and airborne isolat
ion practices. Between 1994 and 1995 there was a trend toward increase
d numbers of homeless patients with tuberculosis, from 8.2% to 17% (p
= 0.07). Decreases in the numbers of HIV seropositive patients with tu
berculosis from 35% in 1994 to 24% in 1995 (p = 0.2) and of jailed pat
ients with tuberculosis from 9.8% to 5% (p = 0.5) were not significant
. Drug-resistance patterns increased from 13% to 24%, with borderline
significance (p = 0.06). The employee purified protein derivative test
ing compliance rate increased from 49% in 1994 to 74% in 1995, with th
e purified protein derivative conversion rate also increasing from 2.7
% to 3.5%. Conclusion: The infection control parameter data were benef
icial in identification of institution-specific risk factors for our p
opulation with tuberculosis. Although labor-intensive, the annual tube
rculosis reports supported requests for administrative and engineering
controls; however, efficacy of the 1994 tuberculosis control plan was
difficult to assess from purified protein derivative conversion rates
alone, because the testing compliance rate also increased.