A SURVEY OF INFECTION-CONTROL PROFESSIONAL STAFFING PATTERNS AT UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM CONSORTIUM INSTITUTIONS

Citation
C. Friedman et C. Chenoweth, A SURVEY OF INFECTION-CONTROL PROFESSIONAL STAFFING PATTERNS AT UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM CONSORTIUM INSTITUTIONS, American journal of infection control, 26(3), 1998, pp. 239-244
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Infectious Diseases
ISSN journal
01966553
Volume
26
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
239 - 244
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-6553(1998)26:3<239:ASOIPS>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Background: Proper staffing of infection control departments has long been a topic of interest. The most complete report on the subject, the Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control, was published in 1985. To provide current benchmarking comparison data for expected staff reductions at the University of Michigan Health System, a survey of University Health System Consortium members was performed. Methods : A survey tool was developed to obtain general demographic, staffing, and case-mix information. An infection control professional at each i nstitution was contacted to obtain most of the information. Additional information was obtained from standard references. Results: Responses were obtained from 45 University HealthSystem Consortium members (67% ). Full-time equivalent ratios were based on the following parameters and compared for the institutions: number of occupied beds (according to occupancy rate, median 137 occupied beds/full-time equivalent), num ber of intensive care unit beds (median 28 beds/full-time equivalent), number of admissions or discharges (median 6686 admissions/full-time equivalent), number of ambulatory care visits (median 104,426 visits/f ull-time equivalent), and case-mix index (median 1.75). Conclusions: M any institutions are using benchmarking comparison data to make decisi ons regarding staff reductions. This survey provides preliminary data for determining the ''best practice'' in staffing for infection contro l departments. More information may be needed to evaluate other factor s that affect infection control professionals' workload.