Ss. Negus et al., DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS EFFECTS OF A COCAINE HEROIN SPEEDBALL COMBINATION IN RHESUS-MONKEYS/, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 285(3), 1998, pp. 1123-1136
Cocaine and heroin often are abused together in a combination known as
a ''speedball,'' but relatively little is known about ways in which c
ocaine and heroin may interact to modify each other's abuse-related ef
fects. The present study evaluated the discriminative stimulus effects
of a speedball combination of cocaine and heroin. Three rhesus monkey
s were trained to discriminate vehicle from a 10:1 ratio of cocaine (0
.4 mg/kg) in combination with heroin (0.04 mg/kg). Both cocaine alone
and heroin alone substituted completely for the cocaine/heroin combina
tion, although cocaine and heroin were more potent when administered t
ogether than when administered alone. Combined pretreatment with the d
opamine antagonist flupenthixol and the opioid antagonist quadazocine
dose-dependently antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of th
e cocaine/heroin combination, but pretreatment with either antagonist
alone was less effective. These findings suggest that either cocaine o
r heroin alone was sufficient to substitute for the cocaine/heroin tra
ining combination. To characterize the discriminative stimulus propert
ies of this speedball more fully, a series of cocaine-like and heroin-
like agonists were studied in substitution tests. The indirect dopamin
e agonists CFT, amphetamine and bupropion and the mu opioid agonists a
lfentanil, fentanyl and morphine produced high levels of speedball-app
ropriate responding. However, the indirect dopamine agonist GBR12909,
the D1 dopamine agonist SKF82958, the D2 dopamine agonist quinpirole a
nd the partial mu opioid agonist nalbuphine did not substitute for the
cocaine/heroin combination. Because these compounds produce discrimin
ative stimulus effects similar to either cocaine or mu opioid agonists
alone, these findings suggest that the discriminative stimulus effect
s of the cocaine/heroin combination do not overlap completely with the
effects of cocaine and heroin alone. Finally, a series of compounds t
hat produce partial or no substitution for cocaine or mu agonists alon
e also did not substitute for the cocaine/heroin combination, which in
dicates that the discriminative stimulus effects of the combination we
re pharmacologically selective. Taken together, these findings suggest
that a combination of cocaine and heroin produces a pharmacologically
selective discriminative stimulus complex that includes aspects of bo
th component drugs.