J. Lovmand et al., B-CELL LYMPHOMA INDUCTION BY AKV MURINE LEUKEMIA VIRUSES HARBORING ONE OR BOTH COPIES OF THE TANDEM REPEAT IN THE U3 ENHANCER, Journal of virology, 72(7), 1998, pp. 5745-5756
Akv is an endogenous, ecotropic murine leukemia virus (MuLV) of the AK
R strain. It has served as a prototype nonpathogenic or weakly pathoge
nic reference virus for studies of closely related potent lymphomageni
c viruses such as the T-lymphomagenic SL3-3, We here report that Akv a
nd an Akv mutant (Akv1-99) with only one copy of the 99-bp transcripti
onal enhancer induce malignant lymphomas with nearly 100% incidence an
d mean latency periods of 12 months after injection into newborn NMRI
mice. Molecular analysis of tumor DNA showed that the majority of the
tumors were of the B-cell type. Sequence analysis of proviral transcri
ptional enhancers in DNA of B-cell lymphomas revealed conservation of
the enhancer sequence, as well as a lack of sequence duplications of t
he Akvl-99 variant, while the repeat copy number in Akv was subject to
fluctuations. In support of a B-cell specificity of the Akv enhancer,
a murine plasmacytoma cell line was found to sustain three-to fivefol
d-higher transient transcriptional activity upon the Akv and Akvl-99 e
nhancers than upon the enhancer of the T-lymphomagenic SL3-3 MuLV. Thu
s, the overall picture is that Akv MuLV possesses a B-lymphomagenic po
tential and that the second copy of the 99-bp sequence seems to be of
minor importance for this potential. However, in one animal the lympho
mas induced by Akv1-99 were of the T-cell type. Among the 24 tumors an
alyzed only this one harbored a clonal proviral integration in the c-m
yc locus. This provirus had undergone a duplication of a 113-bp sequen
ce of the enhancer region, partly overlapping with the 99-bp repeat of
Akv, as well as a few single nucleotide alterations within and outsid
e the repeats, Taken together with previous studies, our results sugge
st that T-versus B-lymphomagenic specificity of the enhancer is govern
ed by more than one nucleotide difference and that alterations in bind
ing sites for transcription factors of the AML1 and nuclear-factor-1 f
amilies may contribute to this specificity.