P. Ricci et al., ADJUVANT CHOLYLSARCOSINE DURING URSODEOXYCHOLIC ACID TREATMENT OF PRIMARY BILIARY-CIRRHOSIS, Digestive diseases and sciences, 43(6), 1998, pp. 1292-1295
We postulated that coadministration of cholylsarcosine with ursodeoxyc
holic acid might provide additional benefit to primary biliary cirrhos
is patients with an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid. Our a
im was to test the tolerability and the effect of adjuvant cholylsarco
sine on liver tests and plasma cholesterol in primary biliary cirrhosi
s patients receiving ursodeoxycholic acid. Four primary biliary cirrho
sis patients, who, despite more than a year of ursodeoxycholic acid th
erapy, had one or more liver tests persistently equal to or greater th
an twice the upper limit of normal, received cholylsarcosine (12-15 mg
/kg/day) in addition to ursodeoxycholic acid (13-15 mg/kg/day) for six
weeks in an open label study. Values of liver tests and plasma choles
terol, determined every two weeks, remained unchanged. One patient dis
continued cholylsarcosine at week 4 because of new-onset pruritus. Ana
lysis of duodenal bile acids in one patient showed 52% enrichment in c
holylsarcosine and hydrophilic bile acids constituted 87% of total bil
e acids. It is concluded that the addition of cholylsarcosine to ursod
eoxycholic acid did not influence liver tests in four primary biliary
cirrhosis patients who had not responded completely to ursodeoxycholic
acid alone. Cholylsarcosine was absorbed and became a dominant biliar
y bile acid; its administration was associated with increased pruritus
.