Learning Disabled (LD) and Average children in grades 3, 4, and 5 were
tested on a sort/recall task consisting of 5 trials of categorizable
words using different categories and different words on each trial. St
rategy use was measured separately at encoding and at recall. Average
children recalled more than did LD children, even when strategy use wa
s equated, an event which was interpreted as a utilization deficiency.
A pattern of increasing disparity between LD and average children wit
h age, due to lack of progress by older LD children, was reported and
explained in terms of Stanovich's (1986) Matthew effect. Average child
ren seemed to benefit most from clustering at recall, while older LD c
hildren may have benefitted more by strategic behaviors at encoding. A
discriminant analysis indicated that LD and Average children differ n
ot only by learning ability but that the basis of their strategic beha
vior and memory performance may also change with age.