Rd. Vincent et al., PROPHYLACTIC ANGIOTENSIN-II INFUSION DURING SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR ELECTIVE CESAREAN DELIVERY, Anesthesiology, 88(6), 1998, pp. 1475-1479
Background: Angiotensin II may prove useful in treating regional anest
hesia-induced hypotension in obstetric patients, because it causes les
s uterine vasoconstriction than do other vasoconstrictor drugs (such a
s phenylephrine). This study compared (1) maternal blood pressure and
heart rate and (2) fetal status at delivery in parturients given eithe
r prophylactic angiotensin II or ephedrine infusion during spinal anes
thesia for elective cesarean delivery. Methods: Fifty-four women were
randomized to receive either angiotensin II or ephedrine infusion intr
avenously during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section deliv
ery. Simultaneous with subarachnoid injection, infusion of angiotensin
II (2.5 mu g/ml) or ephedrine (5 mg/ml) was initiated at 10 ng.kg(-1)
.min(-1) and 50 mu g.kg(-1).min(-1), respectively. The rate of each in
fusion was adjusted to maintain maternal systolic blood pressure at 90
-100% of baseline. Results: Cumulative vasopressor doses (mean +/- SD)
through 10, 20, and 30 min were 150 +/- 100, 310 +/- 180, and 500 +/-
320 ng/kg in the angiotensin group and 480 +/- 210, 660 +/- 390, and
790 +/- 640 mu g/kg in the ephedrine group. Maternal heart rate was si
gnificantly higher (P < 0.001) during vasopressor infusion in the ephe
drine group than in the angiotensin group, Umbilical arterial and veno
us blood pH and base excess were all significantly higher (P < 0.05) i
n the angiotensin group than in the ephedrine group. Conclusions: Angi
otensin II infusion maintained maternal systolic blood pressure during
spinal anesthesia without increasing maternal heart rate or causing f
etal acidosis.