Da. Rogers et al., COMPUTER-ASSISTED-LEARNING VERSUS A LECTURE AND FEEDBACK SEMINAR FOR TEACHING A BASIC SURGICAL TECHNICAL SKILL, The American journal of surgery, 175(6), 1998, pp. 508-510
BACKGROUND: Rapid improvements in computer technology allow us to cons
ider the use of computer-assisted learning (CAL) for teaching technica
l skills in surgical training. The objective of this study was to comp
are in a prospective, randomized fashion, CAL with a lecture and feedb
ack seminar (LFS) for the purpose of teaching a basic surgical skill.
METHODS: Freshman medical students were randomly assigned to spend 1 h
our in either a CAL or LFS session. Both sessions were designed to tea
ch them to tie a two-handed square knot. Students in both groups were
given knot tying boards and those in the CAL group were asked to inter
act with the CAL program. Students in the LFS group were given a slide
presentation and were given individualized feedback as they practiced
this skill. At the end of the session the students were videotaped ty
ing two complete knots. The tapes were independently analyzed, in a bl
inded fashion, by three surgeons. The total time for the task was reco
rded, the knots were evaluated for squareness, and each subject was sc
ored for the quality of performance. RESULTS: Data from 82 subjects we
re available for the final analysis. Comparison of the two groups demo
nstrated no significant difference between the proportion of subjects
who were able to tie a square knot. There was no difference between th
e average time required to perform the task. The CAL group had signifi
cantly lower quality of performance (t = 5.37, P < 0.0001), CONCLUSION
S: CAL and LFS were equally effective in conveying the cognitive infor
mation associated with this skill. However, the significantly lower pe
rformance score demonstrates that the students in the CAL group did no
t attain a proficiency in this skill equal to the students in the LFS
group. Comments by the students suggest that the lack of feedback in t
his model of CAL was the significant difference between these two educ
ational methods. (C) 1998 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.