COMPARATIVE SAFETY OF 2 RECOMBINANT HEPATITIS-B VACCINES IN CHILDREN - DATA FROM THE VACCINE ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING SYSTEM (VAERS) AND VACCINE SAFETY DATALINK (VSD)
Mt. Niu et al., COMPARATIVE SAFETY OF 2 RECOMBINANT HEPATITIS-B VACCINES IN CHILDREN - DATA FROM THE VACCINE ADVERSE EVENT REPORTING SYSTEM (VAERS) AND VACCINE SAFETY DATALINK (VSD), Journal of clinical epidemiology, 51(6), 1998, pp. 503-510
Background: Preliminary review of data from the Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System (VAERS), 1991-1994, revealed that more serious advers
e events were reported in children who received a specific brand of re
combinant hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine. Objective: To compare the post-m
arketing safety experience of the two recombinant HepB vaccines licens
ed for use in infants and children in the United States. Design: Revie
w of a case series derived from passive surveillance data in the natio
nal VAERS. A retrospective cohort study using data from one health mai
ntenance organization participating in Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD),
a computerized record linkage system. Populations Studied: U.S. Childr
en, ages birth-10 year for whom adverse events after HepB vaccine were
reported to VAERS, 1991-1994. Children, ages birth-6 years, who recei
ved HepB vaccine at Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Northern C
alifornia, 1991-1994. Main Outcome Measures: VAERS reporting rates for
each vaccine by manufacturer were calculated from the numbers of repo
rted events occurring within 30 days of HeB vaccination and the number
of doses distributed by the manufacturers. VSD event rates for each v
accine were calculated from the numbers of hospitalization or emergenc
y room visits within 30 days of HepB vaccination and the number of vac
cine doses administered to the cohort. Results: In VAERS, higher rates
of serious events (i.e., life threatening or resulting in hospitaliza
tion or permanent disability) were reported in children who received V
accine A vs. Vaccine B (relative risk [RR]: 3.13-8.18, P < 0.01), part
icularly by those vaccinated in the private (RR: 7.62-28.58, P < 0.01)
, but not public sector (RR: 2.12, P = 0.19). Similar types of events
were reported in recipients of both vaccines. In contrast, analysis of
VSD data showed no significant difference in rates of hospitalization
or ER visits in children who received either HepB vaccine (RR: 0.96-1
.25, P > 0.05). Conclusions: Our investigation reveals that it is unli
kely there is a true difference between rates of serious events tempor
ally associated with the two HepB vaccines in children. This study dem
onstrates the dual roles played by VAERS and VSD in providing a more c
omplete picture of the post-marketing safety profile of childhood vacc
ines, and underscores the importance of using other analytic studies t
o evaluate findings from passive surveillance systems of adverse event
s. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.