M. Mcdonald et al., SINGLE-DOSE VERSUS MULTIPLE-DOSE ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS FOR MAJOR SURGERY - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW, Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery, 68(6), 1998, pp. 388-396
Background: Single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery is
a widely accepted principle; recommendations have been based on labor
atory studies and numerous clinical trials published in the last 25 ye
ars. in practice, single-dose prophylaxis has not been universally acc
epted and multiple-dose regimens are still used in some centres. Moreo
ver, the principle has recently been challenged by the results of an A
ustralian study of vascular surgery. The aim of this current systemati
c review is to determine the overall efficacy of single versus multipl
e-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery and across surgical
disciplines. Methods: Relevant studies were identified in the medical
literature using the MEDLINE database and other search strategies. Tr
ials included in the review were prospective and randomized, had the s
ame antimicrobial in each treatment arm and were published in English.
Rates of postoperative surgical site infections (SSI) were extracted,
2 x 2 tables prepared and odds ratios (OR) [with 95% confidence inter
vals (95% CI)] calculated. Data were then combined using fixed and ran
dom effects models to provide an overall figure. in this context, a hi
gh value for the combined OR, with 95% CI> 1.0, indicates superiority
of multiple-dose regimens and a low OR, with 95% CI < 1.0, suggests th
e opposite. A combined OR close to 1.0, with narrow 95% CI straddling
1.0, indicates no clear advantage of one regimen over another. Further
subgroup analyses were also performed. Results: Combined OR by both f
ixed (1.06, 95% CI, 0.89-1.25) and random effects (1.04, 95% CI, 0.86-
1.25) models indicated no clear advantage of either single or multiple
-dose regimens in preventing SSI. Likewise, subgroup analysis showed n
o statistically significant differences associated with type of antimi
crobial used (beta-lactam iis other), blinded wound assessment, length
of the multiple dose arm (> 24 h vs 24 h or less) or type of surgery
(obstetric and gynaecological vs other). Conclusions: Continued use of
single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery is recommende
d. Further studies are required, especially in previously neglected su
rgical disciplines.