Fs. Goderya et al., ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT EVALUATION OF SPATIAL MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES USINGSIMULATIONS WITH SPATIAL DATA, Journal of water resources planning and management, 124(4), 1998, pp. 181-191
This paper addresses the diffuse [non-point source (NPS)] contaminatio
n problem by integrating the environmental impact analysis in producti
on practices with the economics of spatial management methods. It empl
oys a combination of geostatistical simulation and unsaturated zone tr
ansport modeling to evaluate the effect of spatial variability of soil
-related parameters on NPS ground water contamination. Five management
scenarios of spatially variable nutrient application are developed an
d evaluated on the basis of their impact on production agriculture and
possible environmental pollution. The scenarios are evaluated conside
ring the spatial variability of residual soil nitrate, yield, and hydr
aulic conductivity in the field. The process is applied to three reali
stic cases, differing in the extent of spatial variability, ranging fr
om low to high variability. The modeling results indicate that the ide
ntified framework holds promise for evaluating spatial management prac
tices in terms of production as well as protection of the environment.
For example, results indicate that variable application of nutrient,
based on spatially variable parameters, not only reduced the overappli
cation but also reduced the overall ground water contamination potenti
al. However, the results suggest that the spatial management system ma
y not necessarily result in a decrease in contamination loading for so
me fields, particularly those which exhibit a low variability of selec
ted parameters. Furthermore, results indicate the presence of a break-
even point between the benefits of spatial management technology and t
he efforts used in implementing this technology for various degrees of
spatial variability. Beyond this point, the excess efforts appear to
result in relatively small marginal benefits.